{"id":420,"date":"2011-04-15T09:05:59","date_gmt":"2011-04-15T09:05:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/?p=420"},"modified":"2011-04-15T11:59:49","modified_gmt":"2011-04-15T11:59:49","slug":"metaphors-for-democratic-communication-spaces-new-academic-article","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/?p=420","title":{"rendered":"Metaphors for Democratic Communication Spaces: New Academic Article"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve just published an article in a special issue of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cjc-online.ca\/index.php\/journal\/issue\/current\/showToc \">Canadian Journal of Communication<\/a> : Democratizing Communication Policy in the Americas: Why It Matters. The issue was edited by the fabulous <a href=\"http:\/\/coms.concordia.ca\/faculty\/shade.html\">Professor Shade<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mcgill.ca\/ahcs\/faculty\/lentz\/\">Dr Becky Lentz<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>My article is called<strong> &#8220;Metaphors for Democratic Communication Spaces&#8221;<\/strong> and argues that how decision-makers talk about communications infrastructure is as important as the architectural decisions they make in rolling it out.\u00a0 Decision-makers, even when they understand that the impacts of communications infrastructure are partly related to how consumers adopt it, still often expect that the technology will be a &#8220;magic bullet.&#8221;\u00a0 So instead of thinking about how to create more democratic (or public interest) spaces through citizen participation, decision-makers stick with &#8220;build it and they will come.&#8221; The paper compares two Canadian public Wi-Fi projects, the \u00cele Sans Fil project in Montreal, and the Fred-eZone project in Fredericton. It concludes that both go some way to creating democratic communication spaces, but that they could go further by using language and practices (like co-design) that let citizens participate in imagining how new technology will impact their cities.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the academic version of the abstract:<\/p>\n<p>Communications policies, like many other social policies, are founded on an<br \/>\nideal of democracy that connects the development of communication infrastructures with<br \/>\ndemocratic public spheres. This framing is a constructivist endeavour that takes place through<br \/>\nlanguage, institution, and infrastructure. Projects that aim to develop these capacities must<br \/>\ngrapple with the way such new media technologies are integrated into existing contexts or<br \/>\nspaces, often using metaphors. This paper analyzes how such metaphors are employed in<br \/>\nthe case of local wireless networking. Referring to empirical research on networks located in<br \/>\nMontr\u00e9al and Fredericton, Canada, the paper critiques the narrow approach to democratization<br \/>\nof communication spaces inherent in networks of this type. This narrow focus is associated<br \/>\nwith metaphors used to describe a co-evolution of wireless technology and urban space.<br \/>\nThe paper identifies that the design processes that shape these networks could benefit from<br \/>\na more radical democratization associated with metaphors of recombination of space and<br \/>\ntechnology.<\/p>\n<p>A previous version is online as an <a href=\"http:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1330913\">SSRN Working Paper<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve just published an article in a special issue of the Canadian Journal of Communication : Democratizing Communication Policy in the Americas: Why It Matters. The issue was edited by the fabulous Professor Shade and Dr Becky Lentz. &nbsp; My article is called &#8220;Metaphors for Democratic Communication Spaces&#8221; and argues that how decision-makers talk about [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false,"jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pUfdR-6M","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=420"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/420\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":424,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/420\/revisions\/424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.alisonpowell.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}